Best
Practices - Presentations
|
Project:
|
Community Mental Health
and Substance Abuse Partnership |
| Organization:
|
Health District of Northern Larimer County |
| |
Fort Collins, CO |
This e-mail was written by Erin
Hall after she dramatically altered her Powerpoint
presentation from traditional bullet points and statistics
to pictures and stories.
When I returned from The Robert
Wood Johnson Foundation strategic communications training,
my staff and I worked quickly to re-create my standard
project presentation. But when the time came, I almost
backed out and used my old style. Here's what happened.
The room setup was different than
I expected. It was a large oval "summit-like"
table instead of a classroom-style arrangement. Also,
the group included more powerful people than I was
expecting. There were lots of critical decision makers
and leaders in business, law enforcement and health
care from the Denver area.
The first five brief presentations
were full of very specific facts and stats and lots
of examples of the tables that Andy hates.
[Andy Goodman taught "Presenting with a Purpose."
For more of his tips return to Best
Practices.] Each presentation generated
great conversation and questions. I knew that mine
was going to be very out-of-step with the others.
Because we added so many pictures
the file was huge and led to some technical difficulties.
I was just about to opt for an ad-lib review of our
project. By this time I was convinced that this was
not the right group to use as guinea pigs for my new
presentation style.
As fate would have it, they got
it to work and moved my presentation up in the agenda.
Before I could say anything they popped up my first
slide and introduced me. Crud! Now what was I going
to do? I took a deep breath and dove in!
The slides
(PDF - 760KB) were almost
all photos with a few bullets of text on three or
four of them. I started with a story that highlighted
all the problems with our system. Then I talked about
our partnership, who we are, what we are working on
and why we got started in the first place. I returned
to my story and used the same character (Joe) but
followed him through our system as if all the changes
had been made. [Read the full
story of Joe in the
LFP Storybook.]
Then I talked about a few reasons we have been successful.
I stopped and took questions, then gave what I hoped
would be a hard-hitting emotional closing statement.
To my surprise, they applauded
for the first time that day. But even better than
that, later discussions kept referring to "Joe."
This group asked me to speak about our project because
they are interested in duplicating parts of it elsewhere
in the state. I was concerned that if I used stories
instead of my usual list of key points they would
only get the flavor of our project but not really
understand how it works. I could tell from the comments
later that day that they really got it! They had a
much clearer picture of our project than they would
have if I had used my old style.
And what happened next?